Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Many patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) receive adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy, most commonly amiodarone or sotalol. The effects of these drugs on defibrillation energy requirements have not been previously assessed in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS AND RESULTS The Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) trial was a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of amiodarone plus beta-blocker and sotalol versus beta-blocker alone for reduction of ICD shocks. Within OPTIC, a prospectively designed substudy evaluated the effects of the 3 treatment arms on defibrillation energy requirements. Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were measured (binary step-down protocol) at baseline and again after 8 to 12 weeks of therapy in 94 patients, of whom 29 were randomized to receive beta-blocker therapy (control group), 35 to amiodarone plus beta-blocker, and 30 to sotalol. In the control group, the mean DFT decreased from 8.77+/-5.15 J at baseline to 7.13+/-3.43 J (P=0.027); in the amiodarone group, DFT increased from 8.53+/-4.29 to 9.82+/-5.84 J (P=0.091). In the sotalol group, DFT decreased from 8.09+/-4.81 to 7.20+/-5.30 J (P=0.21). DFT changes in the beta-blocker and the amiodarone group were significantly different (P=0.006). In all patients, adequate safety margins for defibrillation were maintained. No clinical variable predicted baseline DFT or changes in DFT on therapy. CONCLUSIONS Although amiodarone increased DFT, the effect size with modern ICD systems is very small. Therefore, DFT reassessment after the institution of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone or sotalol is not routinely required.
منابع مشابه
Antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Antiarrhythmic drugs need to be initiated in up to 70% of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in order to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias, decrease the frequency of defibrillator shocks, and terminate ventricular arrhythmias along with antitachycardia pacing. trial fibrillation (AF) occurs in about 20% of patients with ICDs (the majority with congestive heart failure [CHF...
متن کاملEffect of Baseline Antiarrhythmic Drug on Outcomes With Ablation in Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia
BACKGROUND: The VANISH trial (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease) compared the effectiveness of escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy to catheter ablation in patients with prior myocardial infarction, an implanted defibrillator, and ventricular tachycardia (VT). The effectiveness of these interventions in patients on sotalol v...
متن کاملPacemaker-ICD/Drug Interaction
When a drug is prescribed for a patient with a permanent pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), consideration must be given to the potential interactions. Drug effect on pacemaker performance is usually thought to cause an increase or decrease in pacing threshold. From a practical view, Class IC drugs must be used cautiously in pacemaker patients, especially in those who ...
متن کاملCardiac imaging in syndrome X: the problem of "reverse redistribution'.
patient with cardiac arrest, as initial presentation of the underlying cardiac disease, who receives an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cost cannot be evaluated, unless the first line therapeutic option for these patients is not an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Another approach could be to randomize these patients to an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or to other forms ...
متن کاملAdjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review.
AIMS To assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy for preventing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a systematic literature search to identify all randomized, controlled trials assessing the efficacy of adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Trial data were reviewed and extracted independently by two investi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Circulation
دوره 114 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006